Referendum #64 · whitelisted caller · translated
Vara runtime upgrade v1.10.0
Original title: [Whitelisted Caller] Referendum #64: Runtime Upgrade v1.10.0
Governance: Executed · Dispatch succeeded
Submitted 2025-12-03T09:04:36.000Z · 2025-12-04T14:07:00.000Z
Verification date in this record: 2026-10-13. This is not a live chain status check.
What this referendum means
What was proposed?
This referendum asked Vara to dispatch the pre-approved call for runtime version 1.10.0.
Why it mattered
A runtime upgrade changes the operating logic of the Vara network and is among the most consequential actions OpenGov can authorize.
An Aye vote meant…
An Aye vote supported executing the whitelisted v1.10.0 runtime-upgrade call.
A Nay vote meant…
A Nay vote opposed dispatching that whitelisted call through this referendum.
What happened or is happening
The Whitelisted Caller track dispatches a call that was separately whitelisted. A complete retrospective must verify the whitelisted hash and historical preimage before describing individual runtime changes as executed facts.
The archived outer call is whitelist.dispatchWhitelistedCallWithPreimage. The referendum executed successfully, but the current capture does not yet independently reproduce the complete inner preimage.
Dispatch a Fellowship-whitelisted call whose proposal materials identify it as the Vara runtime v1.10.0 upgrade.
The proposal linked to the published Gear v1.10.0 release; deployment itself was performed through the approved on-chain call.
Observable on-chain result
Dispatch returned success.
Promised outcomes
- Upgrade Vara to runtime version 1.10.0.
Verified outcomes
- Subsquare records the referendum as executed successfully.
Follow-up: partially-verified
- Runtime-version verification at the execution block remains part of the chain audit.
Still unknown
- The inner preimage still needs to be recovered and decoded from historical chain data.
- The current archive has not yet mapped every v1.10.0 release-note item to the enacted runtime code.
- The captured referendum page identifies dispatchWhitelistedCallWithPreimage but does not expose the inner call body in the stored proposal object.
Further explanation and reporting
No additional reporting has been published for this referendum.
Details and evidence
Participation
Participation
Calculation status: complete. Address-level figures are not counts of distinct people or organizations.
- Individual vote rows reconcile to the aggregate capital total. Concentration treats delegated capital as controlled by the account casting the direct vote.
| Direct addresses | 30 |
|---|---|
| Delegating addresses | 0 |
| Raw capital (VARA) | 1951004500 |
| Weighted Aye power (VARA) | 195100450 |
| Weighted Nay power (VARA) | 0 |
| Approval (%) | 100 |
| Raw capital / captured electorate (%) | 19.51064885 |
| Support capital (VARA) | 1951004500 |
| Top-one share (%) | 7.97538 |
| Top-three share (%) | 23.92615 |
| HHI (0–10,000) | 495.00324 |
| Gini (0–1) | 0.35383435 |
Proposal history
Proposal history
| Referendum | Governance | Execution | Direct addresses |
|---|
Timeline
Timeline
- Submitted · 2025-12-03T09:04:36.000Z · block 28319531
- DecisionDepositPlaced · 2025-12-03T09:04:45.000Z · block 28319534
- DecisionStarted · 2025-12-03T09:34:36.000Z · block 28320131
- ConfirmStarted · 2025-12-04T13:47:00.000Z · block 28353968
- Confirmed · 2025-12-04T13:57:00.001Z · block 28354168
- Executed · 2025-12-04T14:07:00.000Z · block 28354368
Technical call tree
Technical call tree
The Whitelisted Caller track dispatches a call that was separately whitelisted. A complete retrospective must verify the whitelisted hash and historical preimage before describing individual runtime changes as executed facts.
{
"call": {
"callIndex": "0x1503",
"section": "whitelist",
"method": "dispatchWhitelistedCallWithPreimage"
},
"nestedCalls": [
{
"depth": 0,
"callIndex": "0x1503",
"section": "whitelist",
"method": "dispatchWhitelistedCallWithPreimage"
}
],
"limitations": [
"The captured referendum page identifies dispatchWhitelistedCallWithPreimage but does not expose the inner call body in the stored proposal object."
]
}Historical track parameters
Historical track parameters
{
"maxDeciding": 100,
"preparePeriodBlocks": 600,
"decisionPeriodBlocks": 403200,
"confirmationPeriodBlocks": 200,
"minimumEnactmentBlocks": 200,
"decisionDeposit": {
"planck": "1500000000000000000",
"vara": "1500000"
},
"approvalCurve": {
"reciprocal": {
"factor": 270899180,
"xOffset": 389830523,
"yOffset": 305084738
}
},
"supportCurve": {
"reciprocal": {
"factor": 8650766,
"xOffset": 18867926,
"yOffset": 41509433
}
}
}Deposits
Deposits
Governance deposits are not proposal spending.
{
"submission": {
"depositor": "kGgQqLXhVVMv85XDy1v5AE6HVBG1tkAwURrdmq1ewbmGMCaGH",
"amount": {
"planck": "1500000000000000",
"vara": "1500"
}
},
"decision": {
"depositor": "kGhAjUA3Uke6UmWwMRRwFHuxisCgm7dab61sL1tKqA15NXQVX",
"amount": {
"planck": "1500000000000000000",
"vara": "1500000"
}
},
"outcome": "unknown"
}Sources
Sources
Corrections
Corrections
No corrections recorded.