Referendum #60 · root · fact-checked

Timed-out second attempt to upgrade the runtime to spec 1920

No original public title was captured.

Governance: TimedOut · Not executed

Submitted 2025-10-20T08:56:15.000Z · 2025-11-03T11:57:39.000Z

Verification date in this record: 2026-10-14. This is not a live chain status check.

What this referendum means

What was proposed?

This untitled second attempt carried the same runtime-1920 proposal as #59 and #61, but timed out without execution.

Why it mattered

The timeout prolonged the move from runtime 1910 to 1920 until the third submission passed.

An Aye vote meant…

An Aye vote would have supported installing runtime spec version 1920.

A Nay vote meant…

A Nay vote would have opposed this attempt.

What happened or is happening

The proposal hash matches rejected #59 and successful #61. Historical chain state verifies the 1910 → 1920 transition only at #61's execution block.

The referendum timed out and did not execute. The identical proposal succeeded as #61.

If approved, dispatch the runtime-upgrade proposal later executed by referendum #61 to install spec version 1920.

No runtime deployment occurred through this referendum.

Promised outcomes

  • Install runtime spec version 1920 if approved.

Verified outcomes

  • The referendum timed out without execution.
  • Identical referendum #61 later installed spec 1920.

Follow-up: not-applicable

  • Outcome is tied to the dispatch result and verified runtime state, not the lifecycle label alone.

Still unknown

  • The original public record contains neither a title nor an explanatory body.
Further explanation and reporting

No additional reporting has been published for this referendum.

Details and evidence

Participation

Participation

Calculation status: complete. Address-level figures are not counts of distinct people or organizations.

  • Individual vote rows reconcile to the aggregate capital total. Concentration treats delegated capital as controlled by the account casting the direct vote.
Direct addresses4
Delegating addresses0
Raw capital (VARA)336078.555706487597
Weighted Aye power (VARA)33607.855570648759
Weighted Nay power (VARA)0
Approval (%)100
Raw capital / captured electorate (%)0.00336087
Support capital (VARA)336078.555706487597
Top-one share (%)36.02684
Top-three share (%)99.99999
HHI (0–10,000)3345.32217
Gini (0–1)0.27392068
Proposal history

Proposal history

ReferendumGovernanceExecutionDirect addresses
#59 Rejected first attempt to upgrade the runtime to spec 1920

This was the first of three referenda carrying the same runtime-1920 proposal. Voters rejected it before execution.

RejectedNot executed2
#61 Vara runtime upgrade: spec 1910 to 1920 (v1.9.2)

This referendum upgraded Vara's on-chain runtime from spec version 1910 to 1920, corresponding to Gear v1.9.2.

ExecutedDispatch succeeded18
Timeline

Timeline

  1. Submitted · 2025-10-20T08:56:15.000Z · block 27057280
  2. TimedOut · 2025-11-03T11:57:39.000Z · block 27460480
Technical call tree

Technical call tree

The proposal hash matches rejected #59 and successful #61. Historical chain state verifies the 1910 → 1920 transition only at #61's execution block.

{
  "call": {
    "callIndex": "0x1503",
    "section": "whitelist",
    "method": "dispatchWhitelistedCallWithPreimage"
  },
  "nestedCalls": [
    {
      "depth": 0,
      "callIndex": "0x1503",
      "section": "whitelist",
      "method": "dispatchWhitelistedCallWithPreimage"
    }
  ],
  "limitations": []
}
Historical track parameters

Historical track parameters

{
  "maxDeciding": 1,
  "preparePeriodBlocks": 2400,
  "decisionPeriodBlocks": 403200,
  "confirmationPeriodBlocks": 28800,
  "minimumEnactmentBlocks": 28800,
  "decisionDeposit": {
    "planck": "15000000000000000000",
    "vara": "15000000"
  },
  "approvalCurve": {
    "reciprocal": {
      "factor": 222222224,
      "xOffset": 333333335,
      "yOffset": 333333332
    }
  },
  "supportCurve": {
    "linearDecreasing": {
      "length": 1000000000,
      "floor": 0,
      "ceil": 500000000
    }
  }
}
Deposits

Deposits

Governance deposits are not proposal spending.

{
  "submission": {
    "depositor": "kGgQqLXhVVMv85XDy1v5AE6HVBG1tkAwURrdmq1ewbmGMCaGH",
    "amount": {
      "planck": "1500000000000000",
      "vara": "1500"
    }
  },
  "decision": null,
  "outcome": "unknown"
}
Sources

Sources

  • subsquare · retrieved 2026-10-14T00:46:33.897Z · block 27057280

    Public server-rendered page data captured before editorial translation.

  • subsquare · retrieved 2026-10-14T00:56:36.175Z

    Public final vote rows used for voter counts, conviction values, delegation aggregates, and concentration calculations.

Corrections

Corrections

No corrections recorded.

Learn the terms

OpenGov · Referendum · Proposal · Preimage · Proposal hash · Runtime call