Referendum #14 · whitelisted caller · fact-checked
Cancel slash 0 from staking era 327 after the failed first attempt
Original title: [Whitelisted Caller] Referendum #14: Duplicate #13
Governance: Executed · Dispatch succeeded
Submitted 2023-12-28T14:00:45.000Z · 2023-12-28T22:20:48.000Z
Verification date in this record: 2026-10-14. This is not a live chain status check.
What this referendum means
What was proposed?
This referendum successfully repeated the slash cancellation that #13 approved but could not dispatch with its original origin.
Why it mattered
The successful retry prevented the pending slash from being applied after the first referendum failed on origin authorization.
An Aye vote meant…
An Aye vote supported cancelling slash index 0 from era 327 through the whitelisted route.
A Nay vote meant…
A Nay vote opposed cancelling that deferred slash.
What happened or is happening
The inner staking action matches #13's era 327 and slash index 0, although the outer call and proposal hash differ because #14 used the Whitelisted Caller route.
The whitelisted staking.cancelDeferredSlash dispatch returned success.
Use a whitelisted call to execute staking.cancelDeferredSlash for staking era 327 and slash index 0.
No separate off-chain action was encoded.
Observable on-chain result
Dispatch returned success.
The whitelisted staking.cancelDeferredSlash dispatch returned success.
Promised outcomes
- Cancel deferred slash index 0 from staking era 327.
Verified outcomes
- The whitelisted dispatch returned success.
Follow-up: verified-complete
- The review does not infer validator identity or fault details from an era and slash index alone.
Still unknown
- The archived proposal metadata does not identify the affected validator, nominators, slash amount or underlying incident.
Further explanation and reporting
No additional reporting has been published for this referendum.
Details and evidence
Participation
Participation
Calculation status: complete. Address-level figures are not counts of distinct people or organizations.
- Individual vote rows reconcile to the aggregate capital total. Concentration treats delegated capital as controlled by the account casting the direct vote.
| Direct addresses | 53 |
|---|---|
| Delegating addresses | 0 |
| Raw capital (VARA) | 2540877060 |
| Weighted Aye power (VARA) | 686087751 |
| Weighted Nay power (VARA) | 0 |
| Approval (%) | 100 |
| Raw capital / captured electorate (%) | 25.40876081 |
| Support capital (VARA) | 2540877060 |
| Top-one share (%) | 18.89111 |
| Top-three share (%) | 30.77143 |
| HHI (0–10,000) | 602.00579 |
| Gini (0–1) | 0.50375963 |
Proposal history
Proposal history
| Referendum | Governance | Execution | Direct addresses |
|---|
Timeline
Timeline
- Submitted · 2023-12-28T14:00:45.000Z · block 8060061
- DecisionDepositPlaced · 2023-12-28T14:01:03.000Z · block 8060067
- DecisionStarted · 2023-12-28T14:30:45.000Z · block 8060661
- ConfirmStarted · 2023-12-28T22:00:48.000Z · block 8069662
- Confirmed · 2023-12-28T22:10:48.000Z · block 8069862
- Executed · 2023-12-28T22:20:48.000Z · block 8070062
Technical call tree
Technical call tree
The inner staking action matches #13's era 327 and slash index 0, although the outer call and proposal hash differ because #14 used the Whitelisted Caller route.
{
"call": {
"callIndex": "0x1503",
"section": "whitelist",
"method": "dispatchWhitelistedCallWithPreimage",
"args": [
{
"name": "call",
"type": "Call",
"value": {
"callIndex": "0x0d11",
"section": "staking",
"method": "cancelDeferredSlash",
"args": [
{
"name": "era",
"type": "u32",
"value": 327
},
{
"name": "slashIndices",
"type": "Vec<u32>",
"value": [
0
]
}
]
}
}
]
},
"nestedCalls": [
{
"depth": 0,
"callIndex": "0x1503",
"section": "whitelist",
"method": "dispatchWhitelistedCallWithPreimage"
},
{
"depth": 1,
"callIndex": "0x0d11",
"section": "staking",
"method": "cancelDeferredSlash"
}
],
"limitations": []
}Historical track parameters
Historical track parameters
{
"maxDeciding": 100,
"preparePeriodBlocks": 600,
"decisionPeriodBlocks": 403200,
"confirmationPeriodBlocks": 200,
"minimumEnactmentBlocks": 200,
"decisionDeposit": {
"planck": "500000000000000000",
"vara": "500000"
},
"approvalCurve": {
"reciprocal": {
"factor": 270899180,
"xOffset": 389830523,
"yOffset": 305084738
}
},
"supportCurve": {
"reciprocal": {
"factor": 8650766,
"xOffset": 18867926,
"yOffset": 41509433
}
}
}Deposits
Deposits
Governance deposits are not proposal spending.
{
"submission": {
"depositor": "kGgQqLXhVVMv85XDy1v5AE6HVBG1tkAwURrdmq1ewbmGMCaGH",
"amount": {
"planck": "500000000000000",
"vara": "500"
}
},
"decision": {
"depositor": "kGhAjUA3Uke6UmWwMRRwFHuxisCgm7dab61sL1tKqA15NXQVX",
"amount": {
"planck": "500000000000000000",
"vara": "500000"
}
},
"outcome": "unknown"
}Sources
Sources
Corrections
Corrections
No corrections recorded.