Referendum #1 · whitelisted caller · translated
Approved opaque whitelisted-call dispatch with no recorded execution
No original public title was captured.
Governance: Approved · Not executed
Submitted 2023-09-12T17:27:27.000Z · 2023-09-13T11:50:00.000Z
Verification date in this record: 2026-10-14. This is not a live chain status check.
What this referendum means
What was proposed?
This untitled referendum approved dispatching a very large whitelisted call, but the surviving archive does not contain its preimage or a later execution result.
Why it mattered
Without the underlying preimage, voters and later researchers cannot establish what the approved call would have changed.
An Aye vote meant…
An Aye vote supported dispatching the call identified only by its hash and encoded length.
A Nay vote meant…
A Nay vote opposed that dispatch.
What happened or is happening
The outer call was whitelist.dispatchWhitelistedCall, not the with-preimage variant. Referendum #2 referenced the same call hash and length with a different weight witness, then failed at dispatch.
The referendum was approved and scheduled, but the indexed record shows no execution attempt or dispatch result.
Authorize dispatch of whitelisted call hash 0x70cb…c57e with encoded length 1,227,667 bytes and a weight witness of 100,000,000,000,000 refTime.
No additional off-chain action is treated as verified unless explicitly stated.
Observable on-chain result
The referendum was approved and scheduled, but the indexed record shows no execution attempt or dispatch result.
Verified outcomes
- Approval and scheduling are recorded; execution is not.
Follow-up: unverified
Still unknown
- The whitelisted call preimage and intended action remain unresolved.
- The archive cannot establish whether the scheduled call was later abandoned, expired or executed outside the captured referendum event.
Further explanation and reporting
No additional reporting has been published for this referendum.
Details and evidence
Participation
Participation
Calculation status: complete. Address-level figures are not counts of distinct people or organizations.
- Individual vote rows reconcile to the aggregate capital total. Concentration treats delegated capital as controlled by the account casting the direct vote.
| Direct addresses | 6 |
|---|---|
| Delegating addresses | 0 |
| Raw capital (VARA) | 1630025664.935731566687 |
| Weighted Aye power (VARA) | 2489209609.131653154013 |
| Weighted Nay power (VARA) | 0 |
| Approval (%) | 100 |
| Raw capital / captured electorate (%) | 16.30025665 |
| Support capital (VARA) | 1630025664.935731566687 |
| Top-one share (%) | 47.77165 |
| Top-three share (%) | 98.85272 |
| HHI (0–10,000) | 3591.24167 |
| Gini (0–1) | 0.57056222 |
Proposal history
Proposal history
| Referendum | Governance | Execution | Direct addresses |
|---|
Timeline
Timeline
- Submitted · 2023-09-12T17:27:27.000Z · block 4990720
- DecisionDepositPlaced · 2023-09-12T17:33:39.000Z · block 4990844
- DecisionStarted · 2023-09-12T17:57:27.000Z · block 4991320
- ConfirmStarted · 2023-09-13T11:40:00.000Z · block 5012571
- Confirmed · 2023-09-13T11:50:00.000Z · block 5012771
Technical call tree
Technical call tree
The outer call was whitelist.dispatchWhitelistedCall, not the with-preimage variant. Referendum #2 referenced the same call hash and length with a different weight witness, then failed at dispatch.
{
"call": {
"callIndex": "0x1502",
"section": "whitelist",
"method": "dispatchWhitelistedCall",
"args": [
{
"name": "callHash",
"type": "H256",
"value": "0x70cb87457dfed530f91c6d5dc9472c8e2d7437e51c08085a884574951b07c57e"
},
{
"name": "callEncodedLen",
"type": "u32",
"value": 1227667
},
{
"name": "callWeightWitness",
"type": "SpWeightsWeightV2Weight",
"value": {
"refTime": 100000000000000,
"proofSize": 0
}
}
]
},
"nestedCalls": [
{
"depth": 0,
"callIndex": "0x1502",
"section": "whitelist",
"method": "dispatchWhitelistedCall"
}
],
"limitations": []
}Historical track parameters
Historical track parameters
{
"maxDeciding": 100,
"preparePeriodBlocks": 600,
"decisionPeriodBlocks": 403200,
"confirmationPeriodBlocks": 200,
"minimumEnactmentBlocks": 200,
"decisionDeposit": {
"planck": "200000000000000000",
"vara": "200000"
},
"approvalCurve": {
"reciprocal": {
"factor": 270899180,
"xOffset": 389830523,
"yOffset": 305084738
}
},
"supportCurve": {
"reciprocal": {
"factor": 8650766,
"xOffset": 18867926,
"yOffset": 41509433
}
}
}Deposits
Deposits
Governance deposits are not proposal spending.
{
"submission": {
"depositor": "kGgQqLXhVVMv85XDy1v5AE6HVBG1tkAwURrdmq1ewbmGMCaGH",
"amount": {
"planck": "200000000000000",
"vara": "200"
}
},
"decision": {
"depositor": "kGkHzAmjaXaFsLa6tCV3uFzcSHEcKYD8wYkZEJzevQQnzCDr6",
"amount": {
"planck": "200000000000000000",
"vara": "200000"
}
},
"outcome": "unknown"
}Sources
Sources
Corrections
Corrections
No corrections recorded.